Biological treatment approach to inflammatory bowel disease is similar in academic and nonacademic centres - prime time for decentralisation of inflammatory bowel disease care?

BACKGROUND: With the increasing number of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, it is difficult to manage them within specialised IBD teams in academic medical centres: many are therefore treated in nonacademic IBD centres. It is unclear whether the time to introducing biologics is the same in both settings. AIM: We aimed to compare treatment approach with biologics in academic vs. nonacademic centres. METHODS: We analysed Slovenian national IBD registry data (UR-CARE Registry, supported by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation), which included 2 academic (2319 patients) and 4 nonacademic IBD (429 patients) centres. RESULTS: The disease phenotype was similar in both settings. In total, 1687 patients received 2782 treatment episodes with biologics. We observed no differences in treatment episodes with TNF-alpha inhibitors (60% vs. 61%), vedolizumab (24% vs. 23%), or ustekinumab (17% vs. 16%) in academic compared to nonacademic centres (P = 0.949). However, TNF inhibitors were less often the first biologic in academic centres (TNF inhibitors: 67.5% vs. 74.0%, vedolizumab: 20.3% vs. 17.9%, ustekinumab: 12.1% vs. 8.1%; P = 0.0096). Consequently, more patients received ustekinumab (29.8% vs. 18.3%) and vedolizumab (17.4% vs. 13.5%) and fewer TNF inhibitors (52.7% vs. 68.2%) for Crohn's disease in academic compared to nonacademic centres, with no such differences for ulcerative colitis. The time to initiation of the first biologic from diagnosis was short and similar in both settings (11.3 vs. 10.4 months, P = 0.2). CONCLUSION: In this nationwide registry analysis, we observed that biological treatment choice was similar in academic and nonacademic settings. These findings support the decentralisation of IBD care.

Remission Is Maintained after Switch from Dose-Optimised Intravenous Treatment to Subcutaneous Treatment with Vedolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Background and Objectives: The subcutaneous (SC) formulation of vedolizumab has proven to be effective for the maintenance of remission after intravenous induction. Little is known about the efficacy of switching from intravenous maintenance treatment to SC. We aimed to assess the real-world efficacy of switching to SC treatment and to assess the impact of a baseline treatment regimen. Materials and Methods: In this observational cohort study, adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease who were switched to SC vedolizumab maintenance treatment were enrolled. Patients after intravenous induction and patients who switched from intravenous maintenance treatment (every 8 weeks or every 4 weeks) were included. The SC vedolizumab dosing was 108 mg every 2 weeks, regardless of the previous regimen. The clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic disease activity parameters and vedolizumab serum concentrations at the time of the switch and at the follow-up were assessed. Results: In total, 135 patients (38% Crohn's disease, 62% ulcerative colitis) were switched to SC vedolizumab treatment. The median time to the first follow-up (FU) was 14.5 weeks (IQR 12-26), and the median time to the second FU was 40 weeks (IQR 36-52). Nine patients (7%) discontinued SC vedolizumab treatment, with two-thirds of them discontinuing due to active disease. In all dosing regimens, there were no significant changes in the clinical scores and CRP at the baseline and first and second FUs. Clinical and biochemical remission appeared to be maintained irrespective of the previous dosing regimen. Conclusions: The results of this real-world study suggest that the maintenance of clinical and biomarker remission can be achieved in patients who switched from intravenous to SC vedolizumab. The baseline vedolizumab dosing regimen (every 4 weeks versus every 8 weeks) did not have an impact on outcomes.

Biopsies from ulcer edge yield higher histological activity scores than biopsies from non-ulcerated mucosa in active ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate location for biopsy collection in ulcerative colitis is unknown. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the location for biopsy collection in the presence of ulcers which yields the highest histopathological score. DESIGN AND METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study enrolled patients with ulcerative colitis and ulcers in the colon. Biopsy specimens were obtained at the edge of the ulcer; at a distance of one open forceps (7-8 mm) from the ulcer edge; at a distance of three open forceps (21-24 mm) from the ulcer edge; further referred to as locations 1, 2 and 3 respectively. Histological activity was assessed using Robarts Histopathology Index and the Nancy Histological Index. Statistical analysis was performed using mixed effects models. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were included. Decreasing trends with distance from the ulcer edge ( P  < 0.0001) were observed. Biopsies procured from the edge of the ulcer (location 1) yielded a higher histopathological score compared to biopsies procured at locations 2 and 3 ( P  ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Biopsies from the ulcer edge yield higher histopathological scores than biopsies next to the ulcer. In clinical trials with histological endpoints, biopsies should be obtained from the ulcer edge (if ulcers are present) to reliably assess histological disease activity.

Natural History and Risk Stratification of Recurrent Crohn's Disease After Ileocolonic Resection: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Prediction of endoscopic postoperative recurrence (POR) and prophylactic treatment based on clinical risk profile have thus far been inconclusive. This study aimed to examine the association between clinical risk profile and the development of endoscopic POR in a Crohn's disease population without postoperative treatment and to identify individual risk factors of endoscopic POR. METHODS: Medical records of 142 patients with Crohn's disease during follow-up after ileocecal or ileocolonic resection without prophylactic treatment at 3 referral centers were reviewed. Endoscopic POR was defined as a modified Rutgeerts score ≥i2b. Clinical risk profiles were distilled from current guidelines. Both uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to assess the relationship between risk profiles and endoscopic POR. RESULTS: Endoscopic POR was observed in 68 out of 142 (47.9%) patients. Active smoking postsurgery (odds ratio [OR], 3.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-7.34; P = 0.02), a Montreal classification of A3 (OR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.07-8.69; P = 0.04), and previous bowel resections (OR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.07-6.22; P = 0.03) were significantly associated with endoscopic POR. No significant association was observed between endoscopic POR and any guideline defined as a high-/low-risk profile. However, patients with a combination of any 3 or more European Crohns & Colitis Organisation- (OR, 4.87; 95% CI, 1.30-18.29; P = 0.02) or British Society of Gastroenterology-defined (OR 3.16; 95% CI, 1.05-9.49; P = 0.04) risk factors showed increased odds of developing endoscopic POR. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that patients with a combination of any 3 or more European Crohns & Colitis Organisation- or British Society of Gastroenterology-defined risk factors would probably benefit from immediate prophylactic treatment.

Ustekinumab Dosing Individualization in Crohn's Disease Guided by a Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model.

Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody used in Crohn's disease (CD). Dose optimization in case of non-response and the role of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) monitoring remain unresolved dilemmas in clinical practice. We aimed to develop a population PK-PD model for ustekinumab in CD and simulate efficacy of alternative dosing regimens. We included 57 patients and recorded their characteristics during 32 weeks after starting with ustekinumab therapy. Serum ustekinumab concentration was prospectively measured and fecal calprotectin (FC) concentration was used to monitor the disease activity. Ustekinumab PK-PD was described by a two-compartment target-mediated drug disposition model linked to an indirect response model. Lower fat-free mass, higher serum albumin, previous non-exposure to biologics, FCGR3A-158 V/V variant and lower C-reactive protein were associated with higher ustekinumab exposure. Model-based simulation suggested that 41.9% of patients receiving standard dosing achieve biochemical remission at week 32. In patients not achieving remission with standard dosing at week 16, transition to 4-weekly subcutaneous maintenance dosing with or without intravenous reinduction resulted in comparably higher remission rates at week 32 (51.1% vs. 49.2%, respectively). Our findings could be used to guide stratified ustekinumab treatment in CD, particularly in patients with unfavorable characteristics, who might benefit from early transition to 4-weekly maintenance dosing.

Ustekinumab concentrations shortly after escalation to monthly dosing may identify endoscopic remission in refractory Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVES: Some patients with Crohn's disease do not achieve remission with the approved maintenance dosing of ustekinumab every 8 weeks, possibly due to insufficient drug exposure. We aimed to study the exposure-response relationship for endoscopic remission and biomarker normalization with ustekinumab dose escalation to every 4 weeks. METHODS: Out of 135 consecutive patients, 44 with active Crohn's disease despite standard maintenance dosing [at least one of C-reactive protein (CRP) >5 mg/L, fecal calprotectin >100 mg/kg, simple endoscopic score (SES) for Crohn's disease >3] underwent dose escalation to every 4 weeks. Subsequent endoscopic remission (SES-CD ≤3 without ulceration) and biomarker normalization were compared against ustekinumab concentrations. RESULTS: Dose escalation led to endoscopic remission in 28.6% (8/28), CRP normalization 29.2% (7/24) and fecal calprotectin normalization 51.7% (15/29) of patients. Ustekinumab concentrations after escalation were higher in patients with endoscopic remission (6.90 vs. 4.29 mg/L; P = 0.025) and fecal calprotectin normalization (6.65 vs. 3.74 mg/L; P = 0.001). A threshold of 6.00 mg/L identified endoscopic remission [area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC): 0.775; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.551-0.999), a threshold of 4.40 mg/L (AUROC 0.755; 95% CI, 0.545-0.964) two months after escalation identified patients with fecal calprotectin normalization at the end of follow-up. Concentrations <3.5 mg/L after escalation precluded endoscopic remission or biomarker normalization. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic remission was associated with higher ustekinumab concentrations after dose escalation. Patients with concentrations <3.5 mg/L after dose escalation are unlikely to achieve endoscopic remission or biomarker normalization.

Peak Concentrations of Ustekinumab After Intravenous Induction Therapy Identify Patients With Crohn's Disease Likely to Achieve Endoscopic and Biochemical Remission.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about the relationship between ustekinumab exposure during the first 2 weeks of treatment and outcomes of patients with Crohn's disease (CD). We investigated the relationship between serum concentrations of ustekinumab during the first 2 weeks of treatment and endoscopic and biochemical remission in patients with CD. METHODS: In a prospective observational study, we measured concentrations of ustekinumab in serum samples from 41 consecutive patients who started treatment with ustekinumab (approximately 6 mg/kg, intravenously, then 90 mg every 8 weeks), due to endoscopic markers of active CD, at a single center from October 2017 through January 2019. We measured ustekinumab exposure parameters during the first 2 weeks (peak concentration measured immediately after intravenous infusion, week 2 concentration, and area under the curve through week 2). We investigated the correlation between these parameters and endoscopic remission (simple endoscopic score for CD scores of 3 or less without ulceration, assessed centrally) and biochemical remission (level of fecal calprotectin below 100 mg/kg) using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Endoscopic remission was achieved in 10 patients (24.4%) at week 24; biochemical remission was achieved in 17 patients (41.5%) at week 8, 17 patients (41.5%) at week 16, and 21 patients (51.2%) at week 24. Peak concentrations associated with endoscopic remission (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.717; 95% CI, 0.517-0.916); 6 of 13 patients (46%) with peak concentrations above 105 µg/mL (upper tercile) achieved endoscopic remission, compared with only 1 of 14 patients (7%) with peak concentrations below 88 µg/mL (lower tercile). All exposure parameters during the first 2 weeks were associated with biochemical remission. There was no significant difference between the associations of peak concentrations, week-2 concentrations, area under the curve through week 2, or later exposure measures (at weeks 4 and 8) with biochemical or endoscopic remission. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study, we found that serum concentrations of ustekinumab as early as 1 hour after intravenous infusion might be used to identify patients with CD most likely to achieve endoscopic remission. This early measurement might be used to optimize treatment of CD.

Endoscopic remission can be predicted by golimumab concentrations in patients with ulcerative colitis treated with the changed label.

BACKGROUND: In 2018, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) replaced a fixed 50 mg every 4-week maintenance regimen of golimumab for ulcerative colitis (UC) patients weighing <80 kg with new, flexible dosing that allows reactive dose optimization to 100 mg if clinically needed. We analyzed the endoscopic remission rates and pharmacokinetics of this new dosing regimen in real-life settings. METHODS: We prospectively recruited 30 consecutive (17 with body weight <80 kg) patients with UC who received golimumab with the new EMA label. The primary endpoint was endoscopic remission (Mayo ≤1) assessed by centrally-read endoscopy at week 14 and year 1. Golimumab concentrations, measured at nine prespecified timepoints, were correlated with endoscopic remission and identified cut-offs. RESULTS: Endoscopic remission was achieved in 15/30 (50%) and 10/30 (33%) patients at week 14 and year 1, respectively. Reactive dose optimization to 100 mg maintenance was needed in 13/17 (76%) patients. Golimumab concentrations at week 6 predicted week 14 and year 1 endoscopic remission. Week 6 concentrations >10.7 µg/ml were a strong predictor for achievement and maintenance of endoscopic remission during the first year of treatment, while concentrations <5.1 µg/ml identified the opposite. CONCLUSION: One-third of the patients reached and maintained endoscopic remission during the first year of golimumab treatment, but the need for dose optimization to 100 mg every 4 weeks of maintenance was high in patients weighing <80 kg. Golimumab concentrations <5.1 µg/ml at week 6 identified patients who are unlikely to reach and maintain endoscopic remission with the new, flexible EMA label.

Early vedolizumab trough levels predict combined endoscopic and clinical remission in inflammatory bowel disease.

Background: The relationship between vedolizumab trough levels and combined endoscopic and clinical remission is unknown. Objective: To compare vedolizumab trough levels in patients with and without combined remission within the first year of treatment. Methods: We prospectively collected vedolizumab trough levels in 51 consecutive patients (28 Crohn's disease (CD) and 23 ulcerative colitis (UC)) before all infusions up to week 22, and at weeks 38 and 54, with concentrations measured after study completion. Centrally read endoscopy was performed at a median of 46 weeks. The primary outcome was combined endoscopic (CD: Simple endoscopic score for CD (SES-CD) < 4 without ulceration; UC: Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤ 1) and clinical remission (CD: resolution of abdominal pain; UC: resolution of rectal bleeding; both: resolution of altered bowel habit). Results: Median vedolizumab trough levels at weeks 6 (25.7 vs 15.6 µg/mL; P = 0.015) and 22 (15.1 vs 4.9 µg/mL; P = 0.001) were higher in patients with combined remission. A threshold of 22 µg/mL at week 6 (area under the curve (AUC) 0.733; 95% confidence interval 0.567-0.899) and 8 µg/mL at week 22 (AUC 0.819; 95% confidence interval 0.692-0.946) predicted combined remission. Conclusion: Early vedolizumab trough levels predicted combined endoscopic and clinical remission highlighting their possible use in clinical practice.

Evaluation of optimal biopsy location for assessment of histological activity, transcriptomic and immunohistochemical analyses in patients with active Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: The appropriate location for biopsy procurement relative to an ulcer in active Crohn's disease is unknown. AIM: To explore the relationship between biopsy location, histological disease activity, proinflammatory gene expression and the presence of inflammatory cells. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with Crohn's disease and ulcers >0.5 cm diameter in the colon and/or ileum were prospectively enrolled at three centres. Biopsies were obtained from 0 mm, 7 to 8 mm and 21 to 24 mm from the edge of the largest ulcer. Histological activity was blindly assessed with the Global Histological Disease Activity Score, the Robarts Histopathology and Nancy Histological indices. Messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) levels for interleukins-6, -8 and -23 (p19 and p40 subunits), CD31 and S100A9 were measured using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The number of CD3+, CD68+ and myeloperoxidase-positive cells was quantified by immunohistochemistry. Data were analysed using mixed models with location and segment as fixed effects and patients as random effect to account for correlation among segments within a patient. RESULTS: Histological disease activity scores (P < 0.0001), proinflammatory gene expression levels (P < 0.005) and numbers of myeloperoxidase-positive cells (P < 0.0001) were highest in biopsies from the ulcer edge in the colon and ileum, with decreasing gradients observed with distance from the edge (P < 0.05). No differences between colonic and ileal samples were detected for the parameters measured at any location. CONCLUSIONS: Biopsies from the ulcer edge in patients with Crohn's disease yielded the greatest histological disease activity and mRNA levels and had similar readouts in the colon and ileum. Research is needed to confirm this conclusion for other measures.

Optimised infliximab monotherapy is as effective as optimised combination therapy, but is associated with higher drug consumption in inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Combination treatment with azathioprine for 6-12 months is the preferred strategy for starting infliximab due to improved pharmacokinetics. However, optimised infliximab monotherapy with proactive dose escalations in case of low trough levels is a safer but under-studied alternative. AIM: To compare the clinical success and infliximab consumption of combination vs optimised monotherapy strategies. METHODS: We studied the clinical success and infliximab consumption of both strategies in 149 patients (94 Crohn's disease; 55 ulcerative colitis) starting infliximab and undergoing intensive drug monitoring assisted treatment optimisation. RESULTS: The drug retention rates were similar for optimised monotherapy and combination treatment after induction (96% vs 97%, P = 0.73), after the first year (90% vs 83%, P = 0.23) and at the end of follow-up (74% vs 75%, P = 0.968). Similarly, no differences were observed for steroid use at year 1 (5% vs 14%, P = 0.08) or mucosal healing at the end of follow-up (64% vs 67%, P = 0.8). Higher infliximab consumption (7.6 mg/kg q8 weeks [interquartile range (IQR): 5.9-10.3] vs 6.4 mg/kg q8 weeks [IQR: 5.2-8.0], P = 0.019) combined with lower trough levels (1.7 µg/mL [IQR: 0.3-6.6] vs 5.0 µg/mL [2.5-8.7], P = 0.012) resulted in almost 3-fold higher drug-to-trough ratio (3.9 vs 1.5) in monotherapy compared to combination strategy at year 1. At the end of follow-up, when azathioprine had been discontinued for a median of 14 [IQR: 3-33] months, these differences disappeared. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, optimised infliximab monotherapy was as clinically effective as combination therapy but was associated with significantly higher infliximab consumption. The infliximab-sparing effect disappeared after azathioprine withdrawal.

Can we move directly from 5-ASA to a biologic agent in ulcerative colitis?

European consensus guidelines and reimbursement policies position biologic drugs for ulcerative colitis (UC) as a third-line treatment, after failure of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) and corticosteroids/thiopurines. While 5-ASA have a very favorable safety profile, (prolonged) use of corticosteroids and thiopurines is associated with potentially serious adverse events. The therapeutic landscape of UC is rapidly evolving and selective biologic drugs with improved safety are being introduced. The first biosimilars have entered the market, leading to improved cost-effectiveness of older biologic drugs. In addition, new insights have been gained in the importance of stringent therapeutic targets such as mucosal and histological healing to improve the long-term outcome of UC patients, and in the role of therapeutic drug monitoring and treatment optimization in this regard. In this manuscript we tackle the question of whether we should move directly from 5-ASA treatment to biologic drugs to offer better and/or safer care to UC patients.

Success and safety of high infliximab trough levels in inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVE: A prospective trial suggests target infliximab trough levels of 3-7 µg/mL, yet data on additional therapeutic benefits and safety of higher trough levels are scarce. AIM: To explore whether high infliximab trough levels (≥7 µg/mL) are more effective and still safe. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this cohort study of 183 patients (109 Crohn's disease and 74 ulcerative colitis) on infliximab maintenance treatment at a tertiary referral center we correlated fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein to trough levels (426 samples) at different time points during treatment. Rates of infections were compared in quadrimesters (four-month periods) with high trough levels to quadrimesters with trough levels <7 µg/mL during 420 patient-years. RESULTS: Fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein (median [interquartile range]) were lower in patients with high trough levels (fecal calprotectin 66 mg/kg [30-257]; C-reactive protein 3 mg/L [3-3]) compared to trough levels below 7 µg/mL (fecal calprotectin 155 mg/kg [72-474]; C-reactive protein 3 mg/L [3-14.5]) (p < .001). High trough levels were superior also after excluding samples with trough levels <3 µg/mL from analysis. No differences in rates of infections were observed in quadrimesters with high trough levels (16/129 [12.4%]) compared to quadrimesters with trough levels <7 µg/mL (32/344 [9.3%]) (p = .32). Maintaining high trough levels resulted in 32% (interquartile range: 2-54%) increase of infliximab consumption. CONCLUSION: High infliximab trough levels provide better control of inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease without increasing the risk of infection.

The Expanding Therapeutic Armamentarium for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: How to Choose the Right Drug[s] for Our Patients?

The therapeutic landscape for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] is rapidly evolving. Two new biologic drugs, vedolizumab and ustekinumab, have recently entered the marketplace, the first biosimilars have been introduced, and several other agents are at an advanced stage of clinical development. In parallel, therapeutic goals have shifted from symptom control towards mucosal healing and prevention of bowel damage. In the coming years, gastroenterologists will be faced with unprecedented choices when selecting the best treatment for their patients with IBD. In this article, we review existing data on the mechanisms of action, efficacy, and safety of recently approved and late-stage pipeline therapies, and use this information to speculate on the positioning of these drugs, alone or in combination, in therapeutic algorithms for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Histologic scoring indices for evaluation of disease activity in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Histologic assessment of mucosal disease activity has been increasingly used in clinical trials of treatment for Crohn's disease. However, the operating properties of the currently existing histologic scoring indices remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: A systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the development and operating characteristics of available histologic disease activity indices in Crohn's disease. SEARCH METHODS: Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from inception to 20 July 2016 were supplemented by manual reviews of bibliographies and abstracts submitted to major gastroenterology meetings (Digestive Disease Week, United European Gastroenterology Week, European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation). SELECTION CRITERIA: Any study design (e.g. randomised controlled trial, cohort study, case series) that evaluated a histologic disease activity index in patients with Crohn's disease was considered for inclusion. Study participants included adult patients (> 16 years), diagnosed with Crohn's disease using conventional clinical, radiographic or endoscopic criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the studies identified from the literature search. The full text of potentially relevant citations were reviewed for inclusion and the study investigators were contacted as needed for clarification. Any disagreements regarding study eligibility were resolved by discussion and consensus with a third author.Two authors independently extracted and recorded data using a standard form. The following data were recorded from each eligible study: number of patients enrolled; number of patients per treatment arm; patient characteristics: age and gender distribution; description of histologic disease activity index utilized; and outcomes such as content validity, construct validity, criterion validity, responsiveness, intra-rater reliability, inter-rater reliability, and feasibility. MAIN RESULTS: Sixteen reports of 14 studies describing 14 different numerical histological indices fulfilled the inclusion criteria.Inter-rater reliability was assessed in one study. For the Naini and Cortina Score, estimates of correlation were 'almost perfect', ranging from r = 0.94 to 0.96. The methodological quality of this study with respect to reliability was 'good'.With respect to validity, correlation estimates between various histological scoring systems and Crohn's disease activity as measured by objective markers of inflammation (including C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, fecal calprotectin and fecal lactoferrin); endoscopic disease activity scores; clinical disease activity scores; and quality of life questionnaires were reported. Comparisons between histologic scoring indices and endoscopic scoring indices ranged from no correlation to 'substantial' (r = 0.779). The methodological quality of the studies that explored validity ranged form 'poor' to 'good'.Responsiveness data were available in seven studies. After subjects were administered a treatment of known efficacy, statistically significant change in the index score was demonstrated in five studies with respect to six indices. Two studies failed to indicate whether there was statistically significant change in the index score post-treatment. With regard to methodological quality, six of the studies were rated as 'poor' and one of the studies was rated as 'fair'.Feasibility was assessed by one study. The Naini and Cortina Score was shown to be simple to use and feasible for every given case. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Currently there is no fully validated histological scoring index for evaluation of Crohn's disease activity. Development of a validated histological scoring index for Crohn's disease is a clinical and research priority.

Infection Risk With Biologic Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

The development of biologic drugs revolutionized the management of inflammatory bowel diseases: Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. However, while their efficacy has been well established, it remains uncertain to what extent biologic treatments may be associated with important safety risks, such as serious infections, opportunistic infections, or tuberculosis reactivation. Herein, we review and discuss the current evidence on the infection risk associated with biologic therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

The safety of vedolizumab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

INTRODUCTION: Vedolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody to the α4ß7-integrin that blocks lymphocyte trafficking to the gut and is approved for treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). The gut-selective mechanism of action has the potential to improve vedolizumab's safety profile compared to other approved biologic drugs. Areas covered: We review the mechanism of action, efficacy and safety of vedolizumab treatment for UC. The positioning of vedolizumab in management algorithms is also discussed. Expert opinion: The highly selective mechanism of action of vedolizumab restricts immunosuppressive effects to the gut. Vedolizumab is efficacious as induction and maintenance therapy in UC patients who are naïve or refractory to tumor necrosis factor antagonists. No clinically important safety signals have been identified. Infusion reactions are reported in <5% of cases. The rates of adverse events (AE), serious AEs, and serious infections were not different between patients treated with placebo and those who received vedolizumab in a pooled analysis of six randomized controlled trials. Rates of malignancy and mortality in vedolizumab-exposed patients are similar to those of the general UC patient population. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy has not been observed. Vedolizumab is a safe and effective therapy for UC with a unique mechanism of action.